Expropriation Act

From Victory Lap to Legal Boomerang: LFN’s Court Win Against the DA and Minister Dean Macpherson

The Democratic Alliance and its Minister Dean Macpherson thought they had scored a decisive victory against Liberty Fighters Network. Armed with senior counsel, State Attorneys, and a punitive court order, the Minister publicly celebrated what appeared to be a crushing defeat for LFN and its President, Reyno De Beer. But while the victory lap was underway, another court process was quietly unfolding behind the scenes. What happened next changed everything. After considering submissions from both sides, Goliath DJP ruled that the Court was functus officio and granted no costs order against LFN and De Beer, striking at the very heart of the narrative the DA and its Minister had been promoting. This is the remarkable story of how a volunteer-driven public interest organisation, standing virtually alone against a well-funded political party, a government minister, senior advocates, attorneys, and the weight of the legal establishment, refused to back down. From courtroom confrontations and procedural battles to conflicting judicial outcomes and a ministerial celebration that may have come far too soon, this is a legal drama that every South African who cares about justice, accountability, and access to the courts should read.

Now read the full story, which would inspire you not to vote for the DA ever again…

LFN Withdraws Amicus in Expropriation Case – DA Minister Pushes Costs

Tomorrow, Liberty Fighters Network will attend court following a call by the presiding judge — not because a live dispute remains, but out of respect for the institution.

What should have been a concluded matter has now escalated into a direct confrontation with the Democratic Alliance’s Minister Dean McPherson. LFN maintains that a lawfully withdrawn application cannot be resurrected through political insistence or procedural pressure.

This appearance is bigger than one case.

It is a public test of whether the Democratic Alliance still upholds constitutional principle — or whether it has become indistinguishable from the governance conduct it once opposed.

The public is invited to follow the proceedings closely.

LFN Exposes Sakeliga’s Half-Truths on Nil Compensation and the Expropriation Act

Sakeliga has dominated media headlines with claims of a property expropriation at nil compensation. But Liberty Fighters Network (LFN) sets the record straight: this is an old case under the 1975 Act, not the new Expropriation Act. LFN has invited Sakeliga’s CEO to an open debate and offered free legal assistance — yet both were declined. Why?

Special Treatment for the Powerful? AfriForum’s Court Shortcut Under Scrutiny

Liberty Fighters Network has uncovered what appears to be preferential treatment in AfriForum’s challenge to the Expropriation Act. Despite no record of a properly lodged application or enrolment on the urgent court roll, Deputy Judge President Ledwaba issued an order transferring AfriForum’s case to Cape Town — while thousands of ordinary litigants wait years for justice. On 12 July 2025, we formally placed AfriForum and the State Attorney on terms to prove this process was lawful by 15 July 2025, failing which we will escalate the matter to the Judicial Service Commission, the Legal Practice Council, and apply for rescission of the order. This is about more than one case — it is about whether South Africans can trust that our courts treat everyone equally.

Scroll to Top