DA Faces Scrutiny as LFN Takes the Fight for the Baboons and the Environment Back to Court

Liberty Fighters Network (LFN) is placing the DA under growing public scrutiny as the battle over the Cape Peninsula baboons returns to the Western Cape High Court tomorrow Friday, 28 August 2026 at 10h00. But this fight has become about far more than baboons: at its heart lies the still-vacant constitutional Office of the Commissioner for the Environment — an independent watchdog intended to protect the environmental interests of everyone in the Western Cape. With LFN calling for restraint before irreversible measures overtake the litigation, the question is now whether the DA will act, or leave the controversy to the very structures whose conduct is being challenged.

THE BABOONS ARE RUNNING OUT OF TIME — AND THE DA CAN NO LONGER LOOK AWAY

The Cape Peninsula baboons are running out of time. While the courts have spent months dealing with procedure, plans for capture, confinement and irreversible interventions have continued moving forward. But this case has now exposed something far bigger: the Western Cape Constitution created an independent Commissioner for the Environment — an office never properly operationalised, and which the DA-led Province has instead sought to remove. On Friday, 28 August 2026 at 10h00, LFN returns to the Western Cape High Court in a critical hearing that could determine how this fight proceeds. The baboons may have opened the door, but what lies behind it concerns environmental accountability across the entire Western Cape.

He Murdered His Family — But the Court Says He’s Sane: LFN Asks How That Makes Sense

A person brutally murders his entire family. Psychiatrists evaluate him. The court finds that he understood exactly what he was doing — and sends him to prison rather than a psychiatric institution. But if deliberately committing an unimaginable atrocity does not necessarily make someone legally insane, what exactly does it mean to be “sane”? LFN explores the fascinating divide between legal sanity, mental illness, criminal responsibility and what ordinary people regard as “normal” — and asks whether our criminal justice system needs another way of dealing with the most dangerous offenders. What is your opinion? [Comments Invited]

LFN Exposes the Fine Print: South Africa’s Affidavits Are Heading into the Digital Unknown

LFN has formally objected to South Africa’s proposed new oath and affirmation regulations — and what appears at first to be a routine legal update could fundamentally change the reliability of sworn evidence. Remote commissioning, pre-signed affidavits, typed names treated as signatures, undefined electronic platforms and inadequate identity safeguards are only some of the concerns. As South Africa moves deeper into the age of digital identity, LFN asks the question nobody should ignore: if the commissioner and deponent no longer need to be in the same room, how do we prove who actually swore to what?

LFN Follows a Typo — and Asks: Where Is South Africa’s New Incitement Bill?

What began with LFN noticing a simple spelling error — “Offense” instead of “Offence” — opened a far more troubling question: where is the actual Conspiracy, Instigation and Incitement to Commit Offence Bill, 2026? Cabinet has approved this potentially far-reaching criminal-law Bill for introduction in Parliament, the Justice Minister has publicly explained what its clauses and Schedule supposedly contain, yet the actual Bill remains remarkably difficult for the public to access. With its roots in the segregation-era Riotous Assemblies Act and its potential implications for freedom of expression, protest and activism, LFN asks why nobody (either the MSM or popular social media platforms) appears to have demanded to read the legislation behind the headlines.

Scroll to Top