Constitution

The Tide Is Turning: LFN Makes Further Impact Against Banking Overreach

LFN and the Strydom Family have returned from the Gqeberha High Court encouraged after a strong hearing against Standard Bank of South Africa Limited, where significant questions were directed at the bank’s legal team while ordinary South Africans were afforded a respectful and fair opportunity to be heard. The matter, which concerns constitutional property rights and banking conduct, marks another important step in LFN’s ongoing efforts to challenge institutional overreach and defend the rights of citizens against powerful financial interests. Judgment has been reserved, but LFN remains confident that meaningful progress continues to be made in South Africa’s courts through persistence, courage, and public support.

Controversial High Court Battle Continues as LFN Challenges Standard Bank and Judicial Conduct

LFN and the Strydom Family will again appear before the Gqeberha High Court on Wednesday, 13 May 2026, in an important battle against Standard Bank concerning constitutional property rights and the controversial extension of National Credit Act protections to trusts and corporate entities. The matter has further drawn public attention after LFN lodged a Judicial Service Commission complaint against Judge Ivana Bands following her refusal to recuse herself despite previously acting for Standard Bank before her judicial appointment. Supporters and members of the public are encouraged to attend this significant hearing and to assist LFN through voluntary donations as the organisation continues multiple high-impact legal battles against state and banking sector overreach.

LFN Withdraws Amicus in Expropriation Case – DA Minister Pushes Costs

Tomorrow, Liberty Fighters Network will attend court following a call by the presiding judge — not because a live dispute remains, but out of respect for the institution.

What should have been a concluded matter has now escalated into a direct confrontation with the Democratic Alliance’s Minister Dean McPherson. LFN maintains that a lawfully withdrawn application cannot be resurrected through political insistence or procedural pressure.

This appearance is bigger than one case.

It is a public test of whether the Democratic Alliance still upholds constitutional principle — or whether it has become indistinguishable from the governance conduct it once opposed.

The public is invited to follow the proceedings closely.

LFN vs City, CapeNature & SANParks: High Court to Hear Urgent Baboon Governance Case

On Thursday, 19 February 2026 at 10h00, the High Court Western Cape Division, Cape Town will hear an urgent application brought by Liberty Fighters Network (LFN) against the Democratic Alliance (DA) run City of Cape Town, CapeNature and SANParks under case number 2026-024184.

At stake is not simply baboon management — but the legality, transparency and traceability of the Final Cape Peninsula Baboon Management Action Plan. LFN contends that irreversible implementation steps cannot proceed without clearly identified, lawfully authorised administrative decisions capable of judicial scrutiny. After the City and CapeNature refused to support a remote hearing, the matter will now be heard in open court. Members of the public are invited to attend.

LFN Takes On the DA: Western Cape Government Dragged to Court Over Baboon Plan

Liberty Fighters Network (LFN) has launched an urgent High Court application against the DA-led Western Cape Government, including Premier Alan Winde, to halt irreversible actions contemplated under the so-called Cape Peninsula Baboon Management Action Plan. At the heart of the case is not only the fate of the Cape baboons, but the Western Cape Government’s bypassing of lawful environmental oversight, its failure to appoint the constitutionally required Commissioner for the Environment, and its use of task-team structures to obscure accountability. LFN says conservation cannot be reduced to political expediency, nor can permanent wildlife interventions be forced through while constitutional obligations are ignored.

Scroll to Top