Democratic Alliance

LFN Withdraws Amicus in Expropriation Case – DA Minister Pushes Costs

Tomorrow, Liberty Fighters Network will attend court following a call by the presiding judge — not because a live dispute remains, but out of respect for the institution.

What should have been a concluded matter has now escalated into a direct confrontation with the Democratic Alliance’s Minister Dean McPherson. LFN maintains that a lawfully withdrawn application cannot be resurrected through political insistence or procedural pressure.

This appearance is bigger than one case.

It is a public test of whether the Democratic Alliance still upholds constitutional principle — or whether it has become indistinguishable from the governance conduct it once opposed.

The public is invited to follow the proceedings closely.

LFN vs the DA: How the Democratic Alliance Became What It Once Fought Against

LFN has now taken the unprecedented step of challenging almost the entire DA Cabinet in court — Steenhuisen, McPherson, Gwarube, and soon Schreiber. From unlawful vaccine rollouts, concealed decision records, unconstitutional school regulations, and chaotic filings in the Expropriation Act case, the DA has revealed a disturbing truth: once in power, they have become everything they once condemned. While the DA hides decisions, bypasses public participation, and pushes mandates behind closed doors, LFN stands alone in holding each of these ministers to account. This article exposes how the “clean alternative” lost its way — and how LFN is forcing transparency back into government, one court case at a time.

Scroll to Top