With only his late mother’s Bible opened at Psalm 23 before him and conviction as his armour, Reyno De Beer stood alone in the Pretoria High Court against the taxpayer-funded legal teams of SARB and SAHPRA. The hearing tested faith, courage, and conscience alike, exposing the uneasy truth about defective court orders and the declining ethics of a once-noble profession. Judgment is now awaited.
On Thursday, 9 October 2025, a historic human rights hearing took place — quietly, virtually, and without public access. Former President Jacob Zuma’s complaint against the South African state was heard on the merits before all eleven Commissioners of the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights (ACHPR). In a powerful moment of unity, Reyno De Beer, a white Boer and President of Liberty Fighters Network, stood alone to represent Zuma — opposing the State’s senior legal team. Though the hearing remains confidential, the fight for truth continues — and history is being written beyond the headlines.
On 28–29 October, LFN faces the Court Registrar, South African Reserve Bank (SARB) and South African Health Products Regulatory Authority (SAHPRA) in the Pretoria High Court to defend judicial integrity. The case challenges the practice of altering or issuing defective court orders — a fight that could reshape how justice is recorded in South Africa.
Tomorrow (9 October 2025), former President Jacob Zuma’s human rights case against the South African state will be heard — behind closed doors — by the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights. And leading the charge?
A white Boer, Reyno De Beer of Liberty Fighters Network — facing off against the State’s full senior legal team in a case that could reshape South Africa’s legal future. The hearing is confidential. The media is silent. But history is being made.
On 22 September 2025, the Minister of Agriculture, John Steenhuisen, finally produced the official “record of the decision” in LFN’s High Court review case. The record exposed a shocking truth: Steenhuisen had already announced and sourced vaccines on 5 June – weeks before the permit was issued on 30 June. With no real consultation, no safety studies, and no internal reasoning, LFN has now filed a supplementary affidavit to strengthen the case that this was an irrational and hypocritical decision that must be set aside.
