LFN at the Vanguard: Why Your Support Protects Our Freedoms

Excerpt: LFN’s latest Articles and Projects show a clear pattern: the fight against State overreach, unlawful administrative action and corporate abuse is far from over. Our unopposed challenge against the Minister of CoGTA — seeking a declaration that the National State of Disaster legally ended two years earlier — could open the door for a national class action for lockdown damages. Yet public engagement has faded, even as digital IDs, vaccine irregularities, banking abuses and constitutional violations continue. LFN is not politically funded and carries these battles because the public asked for them. These cases will not be fought by anyone else if LFN cannot continue. The defence of freedom is a shared responsibility — and the time to stand together is now.

If you like our work, why not consider a donation or gift of your choice?

or make Quick donation… MobiPaid

For nearly a decade, Liberty Fighters Network (LFN) has stood on the front-line of public-interest litigation in South Africa. From constitutional challenges to unlawful State action, to confronting banks and exposing human-rights abuses, LFN has consistently taken on the battles that affect the daily lives of ordinary South Africans.

Yet, as attention shifts to new crises and the pressure of everyday life grows, many seem to have forgotten why these fights began — and why they are far from over.

Across the Articles and Projects published on the LFN website, a clear pattern emerges: each matter deals with State overreach, administrative abuse, or corporate power pushing beyond lawful limits. These cases are not isolated. They form a coordinated effort to protect civil liberties that remain at risk long after the official end of the COVID-19 era.

One of the most significant examples is LFN’s current challenge against the Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs (CoGTA). The case seeks a judicial declaration that the National State of Disaster legally ended two years earlier than government publicly claimed. If confirmed, this correction has monumental consequences: it paves the way for a class action enabling every person who suffered damages under the continued lockdown regime to claim directly against the State.

The gravity of this litigation should not be underestimated. An unlawful extension of the State of Disaster means millions were subjected to restrictions, arrests, job losses, business closures and forced compliance at a time when emergency powers no longer existed in law. By holding the State accountable, the case aims to prevent a repeat of the unchecked overreach seen in 2020–2022.

What makes the matter even more striking is that the Minister has failed to file an answering affidavit. The challenge now stands effectively unopposed, raising serious questions about government’s reluctance to defend the legality of its own actions. History shows that constitutional violations thrive when the public loses interest — not when abuses disappear.

This is the broader concern reflected across LFN’s ongoing matters:

• unlawful mass-vaccination decisions;
• secretive procurement chains;
• digital-ID systems advancing with limited public understanding;
• abusive foreclosure practices by banks;
• irregular court processes;
• the erosion of property rights under the Expropriation Act;
• the attempt to domesticate global health regulations without meaningful debate.

Each of these issues has been documented on the LFN website. Each is part of a larger ecosystem that affects freedoms, privacy, ownership, bodily autonomy and constitutional accountability.

But there is a practical reality behind the scenes: LFN is not a politically funded organisation. It has no silent sponsors and no corporate backers. The organisation exists because ordinary South Africans asked for these battles to be fought — and because LFN agreed to shoulder them on behalf of those who cannot afford legal representation.

This does not mean LFN is begging for support. It means the truth must be stated plainly: if LFN cannot continue these challenges, they will not be taken over by anyone else. The public asked for someone to stand up. Someone did. But that responsibility is shared — not exclusive.

The danger of public disengagement is that it gives the State exactly what it wants: silence. Silence during the next attempt at emergency powers. Silence when banks foreclose unlawfully. Silence when global health policy is written into domestic law without scrutiny.

LFN’s litigation is not about revisiting the past. It is about securing the future. If the legal foundations of lockdown governance are not corrected now, they will be used again — and this time, the precedents will be stronger and the resistance weaker.

Public participation is not an act of charity. It is an act of self-preservation. Every article, every project, every ongoing case published on the LFN website is a piece of a larger defence structure. That structure stands — but only if supported.

The fight for liberty has never belonged to one organisation. It has always belonged to the people. LFN simply carries the spear. The public determines how far it goes.

Kindly consider supporting our work by giving a donation or gift of your choice.